By Shamala Suresh Kee
“A news organisation should be free to espouse any cause it wishes on the basis of that most fundamental of liberties, namely freedom of expression…..So, if a newspaper wishes to endorse one party, ideology or political alliance over another, that is its unquestionable right. On the readers’ part, they are free to accept or reject the newspaper’s position by choosing either to read its messages or not. This is simple enough a matter in a society that lives by time-tested democratic ideals.”
These are the exact words from the Sun’s editorial March 4 2008, written by the newly appointed editor, Chong Cheng Hai. One would expect a newly appointed editor to reach out to his audience and increase the readership of the publication as a response to the challenge posed by his chair. But, from what I read, the editor is rather unscrupulous over readership, according to him; readers can choose to read or not to read. Maybe it is because the Sun comes free, and people like me don’t have to fork out money for news, we are beyond consideration. I assume this came as a response towards the hammering received by the mainstream media over its slanted, one sided coverage of the election, that the The Sun claims that newspaper publication has the right to endorse one party, ideology or political alliance over another. That is its unquestionable right. As defiant as it sounds, it also sounds childish, and like a stubborn kid saying that it would have want it wants, and no one can say anything about it. Continue reading ‘A news organisation’
Recent Comments